Sarah Peacock — Ratings & Reviews (Northeastern University)

Sarah Peacock is a Biology professor at Northeastern University rated 2.51/5 on Rate My Professors by 85 students, with 3.6/5 RMP difficulty and 36% who would take them again (RateMyProfessors + Reddit, updated October 2026).

Sarah Peacock professor reviews and ratings: 2.51/5 from 85 RMP ratings at Northeastern (36% would take again). RateMyProfessor + Reddit.

Rate My Professors rating
2.51/5
Rate My Professors ratings
85
Would take again (RMP)
36%
Difficulty (RMP)
3.6/5
RateMyProfessor reviews
85

Courses taught

More Biology professors at Northeastern

Student reviews

She was a decent professor. A little boring but decently informative. Let us do test corrections which was nice.BIO2219 2026-10-09 16:29:54 +0000 UTC
Taking A&P I with this professor was very challenging. Lectures seem clear, but exams are confusing and phrased very differently. It felt like understanding the material wasn't enough you had to decode the questions. Even after changing study methods, improvement was difficult. Be prepared to adapt and seek extra resources.BIOL2217 2026-05-05 22:35:52 +0000 UTC
The slides, which she reads straight off of, are too simple to make a student gain the complex knowledge required for her tests. I recommend skipping class and going through the slides slowly and chatgpt concepts that are unclear (which is most of it). Lectures feel like watching a teenager that prepared for the presentation the night before.BIOL1119 2025-02-06 03:13:43 +0000 UTC
Anatomy I and II were so content-heavy, but everything that you need to know for tests is included in the lecture. There's a textbook available, but just focusing on the slides she provides is enough to prepare for all the exams. She's more than fair, but the one thing I would say is that her tone is very monotonous. I was barely engaged.BIO2219 2026-07-27 07:20:03 +0000 UTC
Honestly isn't much of the problem, this is just an intense course with a lot of material. She makes her lectures very wordy and speaks very quickly which can be hard to keep up with.BIOL2217 2026-04-07 01:14:27 +0000 UTC
Literally terrible. She told us that Type 1 Diabetes has nothing to do with genetics.. Thats all I have to say! So So SO terrible, good lord.BIOL1119 2023-12-05 16:24:20 +0000 UTC
She literally reads off the slides the entire class. She barely even knows the answers to her own exam questions. Not a good professor at all.BIO2219 2026-05-31 21:14:08 +0000 UTC
I sat in this class wondering if I would live to see the end of it. It's like sitting through a presentation that was prepared the night before. On the bright side, I had time to do the crossword 3x a week.BIOL2217 2026-01-13 17:12:15 +0000 UTC
She literally just reads from slides and do not actually attempt to teach the material, her tests do not reflect what we have learned, she is unhelpfulBIOL1119 2023-11-10 23:52:51 +0000 UTC
Took A&P II with her again and changed my study habits group study, rewatching lectures,but exams were still difficult. The wording and phrasing of questions are confusing and unclear. It's hard to understand why questions are presented this way, making it challenging to show what you actually know. she is very sweet lady, but she can not teach!!BIO2219 2026-05-05 22:39:30 +0000 UTC
Genuinely seems like she doesn't know what she's talking about. She just reads off the slides and only chooses to answer questions that are on the slides. She gives many tests that are just so conceptual and not straightforward, so prepare to study a lot. It's only difficult because she struggles to teach in an effective manner. It's ridiculous...BIOL2217 2025-12-26 19:15:46 +0000 UTC
I thought knew what I was getting myself into, but somehow it's so much worse. She has three tests throughout the semester and then the final, accounts for 90% of your grade. She talks (well more like reads off the slide) way too fast. She records all her lectures so you can stop showing up to lectures. If you can avoid it, don't take her.BIOL1119 2023-04-14 16:00:35 +0000 UTC
The lectures are the main con! She reads directly from the slides. Her tests are very straightforward. You will get the grade you work for, but you must teach yourself. The content is very difficult. Everything is MCQ, and the final was fair. The lab was the hardest thing I have ever done!! She will let you out early, too.BIO2219 2026-04-23 22:53:26 +0000 UTC
All the bad ratings are for the lab which she has nothing to do with! This class is super easy the exams are right from the slides and theres plenty of ways to get participation credit (including ways outside of class). She's great, the lab is hellBIOL2217 2025-12-17 15:03:08 +0000 UTC
Professor Peacock is the most horrible and unprofessional teacher I've ever had. Each exam can make or break your entire grade so doing poorly on one tanks your grade. It's all MC but the questions are impossible. Nothing like what we learn in class. She reads off the board word for word so there's no point in going to class. Prepare yourself :/BIOL1119 2022-12-16 01:22:01 +0000 UTC

Frequently asked questions

Is Sarah Peacock a good professor?

Sarah Peacock is rated 2.51/5 on Rate My Professors from 85 ratings. 36% of RMP reviewers said they would take them again.

How hard are Sarah Peacock's classes?

Sarah Peacock's classes have a difficulty rating of 3.6/5 on Rate My Professors.

What courses does Sarah Peacock teach at Northeastern?

Sarah Peacock has taught BIOL2219, BIOL2217, BIOL1000 at Northeastern.

Data updated October 2026.

View on RateMyHusky